French anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss proposed that cultural commonalities and differences and similarities are based on everyday opposites such as raw and cooked. I was reminded of that in attending the annual RAW Fair in London March 12th and 13th. It too served up some opposite emotions, to mix my metaphors a game of two halves.
RAW was formed by Isabelle Legeron whose book “Natural Wine” would be the best starting point for anyone who wants to find out about low intervention wines. On its website it describes itself thus: “RAW WINE (rɔː) – adj in a natural state; not treated by manufacturing or other processes.”
There begins my reflection of opposites after attending. Yes there were many wines there which were not treated by manufacturing or other processes but there were also many which, to my mind, are about wines being manipulated by various techniques and by additives, as up to 70 mg per litre of added sulfites are allowed for RAW. Are these natural wines? As there is no actual binding definition then I suppose they are but I doubt that some of the wines at the Fair are truly in the spirit of natural wine. During the posts which I will write about the event, the most important Fair in the UK based on natural wines, I shall be writing about different categories based on the amount of SO2 used.
The game of two halves? Well, that refers to the two days. Sunday was open to the public as well as press and trade and it was very, very busy. Crowds around the tasting tables, wines running out, no seats for eating, very warm conditions do not make sense of for an optimal tasting experience. Plans for the day (to taste everything bar France, Italy and Spain) were put aside as it was more a case of find a table where it was not necessary to barge through to the wine. The effect was that I was probably too harsh in judging the wines that day, my mood was affected. Monday was much more like it, more opportunity to access the tables, talk to the producers and, it was when I tasted my favourite wines of the weekend.
- Amphorae. It is THE most trendy winemaking technique, ferment and age your grapes in clay amphorae, usually 800l or bigger. I have tasted and enjoyed quite a few amphorae wines but generally I am not partial to the drying effect they have on wines (in my opinion). They do seem to give a sense of licking the clay container before drinking the wine ( a description given to me by my friend David Crossley). Winemakers do add a manufacturing process to their wine and quite rightly experiment to make the wines they want, but I don’t necessarily always enjoy the results. I prefer my wine truly raw rather than cooked earth.
- Young and old. The natural wine movement is growing. Producers from all around the world, traditional producers experimenting with lesser amounts of sulfites (it was interesting to see a big name from Burgundy at RAW) and most of all amongst younger wine drinkers. It seems to be true that younger wine drinkers, perhaps less weighed down by conventional expectations of what makes good wine, are attracted to natural wines. Those who predicted its demise are being defied by this growing band of supporters. I heard accents and languages from all around the world, long may it continue. And, meanwhile, older wine enthusiasts like myself can appreciate the energy and life in the wines and the people linked to them.
- Faults. Critics of natural wines most often levy accusations of faulty winemaking. I tasted several hundred wines during RAW and I found faults in less than a dozen, mainly mousiness and two corked wines. Some are a little volatile and acidic but personally I enjoy such wines if the volatility is not completely out of control. The winemakers should be praised for their skill, the % of faulty wines was certainly a lot less than the % of dull wines I taste at many conventional wine tastings.
The two days were very enjoyable overall despite the crowding on day one. I was able to get round most tables and to taste some excellent wine. The next posts will describe some of those and some conclusions I drew from the event. The RAW website has excellent profiles of the producers and the wines on show, I will provide links to this site whenever I can. Let me start with my favourite range of the weekend which epitomises the feeling of opposites I had after RAW.
The Scholium Project (California) RAW link
Abe Schoener is a winemaker who pushes the boundaries, restless in trying to improve his wines. The wines are superb, very drinkable yet with great complexity. They made me smile, gave me great pleasure but also made me think. By accident as much as design it was found that by not topping up the barrels and not using pigeage the juice protected itself, the cap of skins helping rather than hindering. Indeed the Chardonnay, Michael Faraday 2014, developed a flor like sherry does. The result was pure juice, no hint of off notes either in aroma or taste. I liked all four wines on show, but especially the 26 day skin contact, no SO2 added Sauvignon Blanc, The Prince In His Caves 2015, and the Petite Sirah, Babylon 2013, which spent 3 years in barrels, again not topped up. I would normally be put off wines aged for so long in wood, I am not a great fan of too much skin contact yet here the wines were full of life and energy. Truly outstanding wines.
See what I mean about contradictions and opposites! RAW played with my expectations and prejudices.
Next time: the sulfite free wines which pleased me.
March 15, 2017 at 8:46 pm
I should in all fairness say that whilst that description did come from me, I am a big fan of amber/orange/maceration wines. I mean, I even liked Mathier’s red Amphore. The texture needs fruit as well. Clean and ripe. That is the key.
I was only there on Monday so I missed those crowds. I find, increasingly, that if I’m doing a couple of tastings a week I can’t cope when it’s crowded. Too tiring. But you can see why the organisers allow so many in. They need to break even. It’s when people get drunk that I get really pissed off, but I didn’t see a lot of that at Raw.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 15, 2017 at 8:58 pm
No I didn’t see any drunkenness either day and I do understand the paying public helps them to make money. It is probably a sign of my age and grumpiness but the bigger crowds just annoy me. An example of mood and opinion going side by side.
March 16, 2017 at 9:38 am
I was talking to an oenologue last night who uses a lot of amphorae. He believes that there is a transfer of metals between the amphora and its contents. It could very well be that why you get the feeling of “licking clay.”
Maybe having a relatively high price point means that you get a higher calibre customer and therefore less drunkeness. Keeps hoi polloi out. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 16, 2017 at 9:59 am
Presumably the oenologue likes that metallic note? There is surely something going on like that as so many amphora wines seem to me to have that common note. (There could be a psychological expectation when I see or hear that it is amphora raised of course). Perhaps as winemakers become more practised and the amphorae more seasoned that will begin to resolve itself? You have prompted me to read more ☺
Your second point might very well be true!
March 23, 2017 at 12:05 am
Good to hear that the Monday was more relaxed and productive. On Sunday night it did sound like the day had been a bit of a hot scrum with relatively few exciting finds.
March 23, 2017 at 8:57 am
Indeed, there must be some kind of psychological effect so I’ve tried to be more generous to some tasted on Sunday.